Graft Responses to three different techniques in Mango (Mangifera indica L.) under Bhutanese nursery conditions

AUTHOUR: Sonam Chophel and Kinley Dorj

ABSTRACT

Veneer grafting (Inarching) is a vegetative method of mass propagation of mango in Bhutan. However, this method of propagation has many setbacks in Bhutanese nursery conditions. The most important disadvantage of this method is high cost of production as grafting is done in field and seedlings are kept in open condition until proper graft union is formed. Providing graft aftercare in open field spread in large areas prove challenging in Bhutanese conditions. This study was aimed at identifying viable alternative methods of propagation to Veneer grafting. The experiment was conducted at Agriculture Research and Development Center, Bajo in 2015 in Horticulture Nursery Block. Three grafting techniques (Veneer, Splice and Wedge) were evaluated for different indicators of shoot, leaf and graft success. The results showed no significant difference (p<0.05) among the grafting techniques studied at 95% confidence interval. Initial rate of graft success before 20 DAG was higher for Wedge followed by Veneer or Inarching; however the gap narrowed after 60 DAG. Splice grafting showed higher rate of graft success (60%) and survival percentage (53) after 60 DAG than the veneer grafting (control). Our findings suggest that splice and wedge grafting can be safely followed for mass propagation of mango in Bhutanese nursery conditions. Further work on study of cost of production using different propagating techniques for mango would be useful for coming up with recommendation package.

KEYWORD:

Graft response, mango, grafting techniques, Bhutanese nursery

FULL TEXT: PDF Download

 

REFERANCES

ACIAR. n.d. New South Wales. http://aciar.gov.au/files/mn_193_citrus_and_mango.pdf; accessed on 17 May 2015. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Grafting Mangoes., Queensland Government, Queensland, Australia. https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/plants/fruit-andvegetables/fruitand-nuts/mangoes/grafting-mangoes; accessed on 15 May 2015.

Donovan N, Bally I, Cooke T, House S. 2016. Nursery Manual for Citrus and Mango.

Ghalley O, Lham K, Wangdi S. 2014. Monitoring of Mango Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) Population Trend at Kamichu and Baychu Royal Orchards.

Islam M, Rahim M., Farooque A. 2004. Standardization of time and grafting techniques in mango under Bangladesh condition. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 3: 378-386. DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2004.378.386.

Kumar A, Prakash S, Kumar V, Kumar M. 2015. Effect of Propagation Techniques on survivality in Mango (Mangifera Indica L.). Annals of Horticulture 8: 103-106. http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ah&volume=8&issue=1&artic le=019; accessed on 17 May 2016.

Kumar P, Thakur N. 2016. Effect of age of rootstocks and different growing media on the success of stone grafting in mango, Mangifera indica L. International Journal of Farm Sciences. 6: 255-261.https://www.inflibnet.ac.in/ojs/index.php/IJFS/article/ view/3671; accessed on 17 May 2017.

Lynch J, Roy N. 2015. Current methods of vegetative propagation of avocado, mango, lychee and guava in Florida. REVISTA CEIBA 4: 315-336. https://bdigital .zamorano.edu/bitstream/11036/4685/1/02.pdf; accessed on 17 May 2017.

Majeed A.M. K, Prakash S, Singh M, Soni S, Kumar A. 2014. Effect of duration of defoliation of scion stick and grafting on the performance of veneer grafting in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Annals of Horticulture 8: 198-201.DOI : 10.5958/0976-4623.2015.00018.3

Mulinge W.K. 2015. Factors influencing grafted mango (Mangifera indica L.) production in Matinyani division, Kitui County. http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/1234 56789/1293; accessed on 17 May 2017.

Nayak G, Sen S. 2000. Seasonal influence of veneer grafting of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Environment and Ecology 18: 156-158 https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/ abstract/20000310873; accessed on 17 May 2017.

Omer A, Said A, Mohamed T. 2016. Improving Vegetative Propagation of Mango. Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences 17: 1-8. http://repository.sustech. edu/handle/123456789/16976; accessed on 17 Aug 2017.

Pratap S, Verma P, Kumar A. 2017. Studies on Performance of Self-Grafted Mango Cultivars under Nursery and Field Condition. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 6: 2775-2781.https://www.ijcmas.com/6-10-/Harmanbir%20Singh,%20et%20al.pdf; accessed on 17 Aug 2017.

IMS (Information Management Section). 2016. DoA, Thimphu, Bhutan

Agriculture Statistics. 2014. Department of Agriculture, Thimphu, Bhutan Vol 1. Sivudu B, Reddy M, Baburatan P, Dorajeerao A. 2014. Effect of structural conditions on veneer grafting success and survival of mango grafts (Mangifera indica cv. Banganpalli). Plant Arch 14: 71-75.http://plantarchives.org/PDF/Vol.%2014(1) %20(71-75).pdf; accessed on 17 Aug 2017.

SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.

Ullah S.S, Malik, S., Prakash, S., Singh, M.K., 2017. Standardization of time and technique of grafting for quality production of nursery plants of amrapali mango (Mangifera indica L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6: 14-17. http://www.phytojournal.com/archives/?year=2017&vol=6&issue=5&part=A&Arti cleId=1625; accessed on 17 Aug 2017.

Vasara R, Satodiya B, Tsomu T, Kore P. 2017. Effect of tying materials on softwood grafting in mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cultivars under middle Gujarat conditions. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 5: 84-86.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *